To track where the justices spent $6.9 million, researchers classified the 9,699 expenditures into 10 spending categories. This revealed that the justices spent 94 percent of their money on the top four categories: Campaign-Related Expenditures; Staff & Consultants; Travel & Lodging; and Administrative/Office Expenses.

 

Supreme Political Spending By Category, Jan. 2001 to June 2007

 

Expenditure Category	Total Spent	No. of Expenditures	Share of All Spending
Campaign-Related Expenditures	$4,983,430	1,369	72%
Staff & Consultants	$655,895	391	10%
Travel & Lodging	$512,795	2,863	7%
Administrative/Office Expenses	$328,331	2,428	5%
Food, Drink & Events	$213,602	1,882	3%
Miscellaneous	$80,374	393	1%
Gifts/Charitable Contributions	$44,584	239	1%
Rent Payments	$35,450	66	1%
Political Contributions	$28,817	57	<1%
*Unknown	*$6,805	11	<1%
TOTAL:	$6,890,082	9,699	100%

                                         *Correction: The expenditures initially categorized as “Unknown” were itemized in a
                                         separate filing. See the “Unknown” section for more details.

Many gray areas blur the lines between the spending categories used here. Some of this grayness stems from poor disclosure by the justices. In other cases it is the nature of the beast. The same justice may make two payments to the same consulting firm, listing one as for a “mailing” and the other for “consulting.” The first would be classified in this schema as a “Campaign-Related Expenditure” and the other under “Staff & Consultants.” Yet both may have been used for the exact same purpose. Despite such disclosure inconsistencies, these classifications reveal real differences in how individual justices spent their political funds. The rest of this report analyzes each of the 10 spending categories.

 

---

1. Campaign-Related Expenditures	5. Food, Drinks & Events	9. Political Contributions
2. Staff & Consultants	6. Miscellaneous	10. Unknown Expenditures
3. Travel & Lodging	7. Gifts/Charitable Contributions
4. Administrative/Office Expenses	8. Rent Payments

---

 

Overall, Campaign-Related Expenditures accounted for 72 percent of the justices’ spending. Big spender Don Willett, who was elected in 2006 by razor-thin margins, spent the most on Campaign-Related Expenditures in absolute terms ($1.6 million) and as a share of his total expenditures (92 percent). The justices spending the next-largest shares of their funds on this category were Justices Green (81 percent), Brister (79 percent), Wainwright (78 percent) and Jefferson (77 percent).

The two longest-serving justices dedicated the smallest share of their funds to Campaign-Related Expenditures. Justice Hecht spent just 3 percent of his funds to this category. Justice O’Neill spent a relatively modest one-third of her money on Campaign-Related Expenditures.

Campaign-Related Expenditures

Justice	Total Category Expenditures	This Category’s Share of Total Expenditures
Willett	$1,614,038	92%
Jefferson	$1,003,863	77%
Wainwright	$857,855	78%
Green	$611,318	81%
Hecht	$17,591	3%
Brister	$397,146	79%
Medina	$267,498	58%
O'Neill	$74,043	33%
Johnson	$140,076	73%
TOTALS:	$4,983,430	72%

 

Largest Single Campaign-Related Expenditures

Justice	Amount	Recipient	Description	City
Willett	$423,195	Crossroads Media, LLC	Media Buy	Alexandria, VA
Wainwright	$199,717	Anthem Media	Media Costs	Austin
Brister	$150,000	Weeks & Co.	Advertising	Austin
Jefferson	$118,241	National Media, Inc.	Media Expense	Alexandria, VA
Jefferson	$104,000	Guerra DeBerry Coody	Direct Mail Expense	San Antonio
Jefferson	$78,333	John Doner & Assoc.	Postage and Campaign brochures	Austin
Willett	$76,981	U.S. Postal Service	Postage expense	Austin
Willett	$75,000	Norway Hill Assoc.	Consulting	Hancock, NH
Green	$66,875	Crossroads Media, LLC	Media expense	Alexandria, VA
Willett	$66,696	Thomas Graphics, Inc.	Direct mail expense	Austin
Willett	$63,044	J2 Strategies	Direct mail expense	Austin
Green	$56,250	Murphy Turner & Assoc.	Direct mail expense	Austin
Brister	$54,803	MJS Group	Political Consulting	Houston
Brister	$30,000	Advantage, Inc.	Automated calls	Arlington

           Note: Excludes multiple checks from the same justice to the same recipient.

The top recipient of the justices’ Campaign-Related spending was Virginia-based Crossroads Media, which collected a total of $970,227 from Justices Willett and Green. Michael D. Dubke incorporated Crossroads Media in Virginia in 2001. The following year Crossroads landed a new client: Texas Governor Rick Perry. The Perry campaign has since routed a remarkable $32.8 million in media buys through Crossroads. Perry also laid the groundwork for Justice Willett to pay Crossroads $831,517 when he appointed Willett to a vacant Supreme Court seat in 2005.

Perry political consultant Dave Carney is responsible for the extraordinary flow of Texas political-ad money through this small Virginia Crossroads. Willett and Green are the only justices who used Carney’s consulting firm, Norway Hill Associates. They paid it a total of almost $150,000. Carney has close ties to a more notorious Dubke enterprise: Americans for Job Security (AJS). AJS formed in 1997 with $1 million from the American Insurance Association.⁷ With Dubke as its president and Carney as a consultant, AJS has spent tens of millions of dollars from unspecified corporations to run “issue ads” attacking predominantly Democratic candidates across the nation.⁸ AJS is best known locally for its 2004 ads attacking moderate Republican Tommy Merritt for “stupid bills and higher taxes.” The attacks helped Kevin Eltife (R-Tyler) defeat Merritt in a scramble for an open senate seat.⁹

Such background is important given that Texas may be approaching the day when Democrats will be able to challenge the GOP’s control of the high court.¹⁰ The fact that two sitting justices already have Crossroads and Carney on retainer illustrates how nasty serious partisan contests for the high court could become. Texans may discover that the only thing worse than knowing which special interests are spending millions of dollars to elect there justices is not knowing which special interests are spending millions of dollars to elect their justices.

Justice Jesse Wainwright paid a total of $436,802 to another firm with attack-dog credentials. Former Midland County Judge Jeff Norwood founded Austin-based Anthem Media, which was the No. 2 recipient of the justices’ Campaign-Related Expenditures. Anthem’s business skyrocketed in the 2006 election cycle, when a PAC controlled by San Antonio hospital-bed magnate James Leininger paid Anthem $1.8 million to run ads attacking five moderate House Republicans who opposed Leininger’s school-voucher agenda.

Another big recipient of the justices’ Campaign-Related Expenditures is voucher warrior Jason Johnson, who ran Leininger’s Texans for School Choice PAC during the 2006 campaign. Justice Willett—a former fellow at Leininger’s Texas Public Policy Foundation—paid $200,812 to Johnson’s J2 Strategies consulting firm. Leininger, who champions strict limits on the civil justice system, personally has contributed $35,000 to the current justices since 2002.

The granddaddy of the Republican-controlled Texas Supreme Court is President Bush’s former advisor Karl Rove, who sold his Austin-based consulting firm to some employees in 1999. Principals with the resulting Olsen Delisi & Shuvalov (now Olsen & Shuvalov)¹¹ collected a total of $270,712 from Justices Brister, Medina, O’Neill, Johnson and Wainwright.

Finally, political fundraiser Susan Lilly of Lilly & Co. collected a total of $470,983 to top off the war chests of Justices Green, Jefferson, Johnson and Willett.

 

 

Justice Hecht, who spent a minimal share of his war chest on Campaign-Related Expenditures, dominated spending on Staff & Consultants. Staff & Consultants accounted for 58 percent of the almost $600,000 that Justice Hecht spent. Justice O’Neill spent 12 percent of her funds on Staff & Consultants (all of which went to her accounting firm), followed by Justice Medina at 11 percent. Justices Brister, Green and Wainwright spent less than 3 percent of their funds on this category.

Staff & Consultants Expenditures

Justice	Total Category Expenditures	This Category’s Share of Total Expenditures
Hecht	$342,479	58%
Jefferson	$116,759	9%
Willett	$73,815	4%
Medina	$49,789	11%
O'Neill	$27,764	12%
Green	$17,583	2%
Johnson	$12,730	7%
Wainwright	$9,945	1%
Brister	$5,030	1%
TOTALS:	$655,895	10%

 

Largest Single Staff & Consultants Expenditures

Justice	Amount	Recipient	Description	City
Hecht	$313,745	Jackson Walker	Legal fees	Dallas
Willett	$35,650	Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP	Legal services	Houston
Jefferson	$8,933	Lockart Atchley & Assoc. LLP	Accounting services	Austin
Wainwright	$7,606	E. Lee Parsley	Legal consultation	Austin
Jefferson	$6,588	Mike McMullen	Wages	Austin
Willett	$5,059	Lockart Atchley & Assoc. LLP	Accounting services	Austin
Brister	$5,030	Wright Brown & Close LLP	Legal Fees	Houston
Green	$4,168	Millan & Co. P.C.	Accounting expense	Austin
Willett	$3,291	Millan & Co. P.C.	Accounting expense	Austin
Medina	$3,019	Megan Schad	Payroll expense	Austin
O'Neill	$2,645	Lockart Atchley & Assoc. LLP	Accounting services	Austin
Jefferson	$2,180	Capitol Accounting	Accounting	Pflugerville
Jefferson	$2,024	IRS	Payroll Taxes	Ogden, UT
Medina	$1,875	Millan & Co. P.C.	Accounting expense	Austin
Medina	$1,710	Edward  Shack	Legal expense	Austin
Jefferson	$1,553	Millan & Co. P.C.	Accounting expense	Austin
Johnson	$1,533	Millan & Co. P.C.	Accounting services	Austin

                   Note: Excludes multiple checks from the same justice to the same recipient.

Hecht spent $342,479 on Staff & Consultants, paying all but $62 of this money to Dallas-based Jackson Walker for “legal fees.” The firm headed Hecht’s successful appeal of a 2006 admonishment by the Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct for “persistent and willful” violations of judicial rules. This censure resulted from Hecht’s cheerleading for the 2005 nomination of his former girlfriend, Harriet Miers, to the U.S. Supreme Court. Two days before President Bush nominated Miers, presidential advisor Karl Rove recruited Hecht to promote the nominee. Hecht lobbied Focus on the Family head James Dobson¹² and granted some 120 media interviews before Miers withdrew under fire from Christian conservatives and elite jurists, who suggested that high-court nominees ought to have a smidgeon of judicial experience. The stacks of campaign funds that Hecht spent on the Miers mess must rank her among the most expensive dates in the history of judicial campaign finances.

Jackson Walker attorney Chip Babcock overturned Hecht’s admonishment in 2006, arguing that the justice’s First Amendment rights trumped state judicial canons that bar judges from making political endorsements that might tarnish the prestige of the judiciary. Hecht then personally demonstrated that a routine practice of Texas judges inflicts much greater damage to the judiciary than his Miers advocacy did. In 2007 Hecht solicited appellate attorneys who practice in his courtroom to pay his legal bills, raising a quick $447,000.¹³ On this rampant, conflict-ridden practice the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct is mute.

Two other justices tapped political funds to retain appellate law firms. Justice Willett paid $35,650 to Weil Gotshal & Manges in 2006. Justice Brister paid $5,030 in 2004 to Houston-based Wright Brown & Close LLP. Three justices also paid Austin ethics attorney Ed Shack a total of almost $8,000. Two of these judges (Medina and Green) currently face charges of improperly spending campaign money for personal travel expenses (the next section addresses the court’s Travelgate scandal).

Justice Wainwright paid a total of $8,880 in legal fees in 2003 and 2004 to Austin attorney E. Lee Parsley. Parsley recently surfaced to defend Wainwright’s court from activism charges. Steve Bresnen, a longtime lobbyist for clients that include the Texas Trial Lawyers Association, wrote an open letter in late 2007 blasting the Texas Supreme Court for issuing results-oriented opinions that steamroll legislative intent and overturn precedents. As the most recent example, Bresnen cited the court’s unanimous 2007 Entergy Gulf States v. Summers opinion, which wiped away liabilities that industrial employers previously faced for contract workers injured on their premises. Parsley’s rebuttal of Bresnen’s claims argued that the court properly relied on the clear language of the underlying statutes.

Justices Jefferson, O’Neill and Willett paid a total of $93,177 to the Austin accounting firm of Lockart Atchley & Associates. Five justices paid a total of $80,862 to Austin-based accountant Millan & Co., whose founder—Richard Millan—is treasurer of Texans for Medina.¹⁴ After Medina’s campaign paid almost $27,000 to Millan & Co., Medina’s attorney blamed bad advice from an unnamed accountant for the fact that Justice Medina improperly used campaign funds to reimburse himself for thousands of dollars in personal travel expenses.¹⁵ When a member of Texas’ highest court acknowledges that he lined his own pockets in violation of state ethics laws and blames his accountant for bad legal advice what has become of personal responsibility?

Richard Millan also is treasurer of Texas Builds Jobs & Opportunity for a Secure Future PAC (Texas Jobs PAC). In January 2008, this penniless PAC received a stunning $250,000 from the campaign of embattled House Speaker Tom Craddick. The next day, Texas Jobs PAC forwarded most of Craddick’s money to the reelection campaigns of three of Craddick’s Democratic allies in the House. These transactions prompted Texans For Public Justice to file a complaint with Travis County District Attorney’s Public Integrity Unit. That pending complaint requests an investigation to determine if Craddick and Texas Jobs PAC violated the so-called speaker’s law, which prohibits expenditures to aid or defeat a speaker candidate.¹⁶

 

 

Justice Medina—whose campaign-fueled vehicle never seemed to stop—spent the greatest share of his campaign funds on Travel & Lodging (19 percent). Justice Hecht chased Medina, spending 17 percent of his funds on this category. Meanwhile, homebody Justice Willett spent just 1 percent of his funds on Travel & Lodging, while Justice O’Neill spent a relatively modest 4 percent.

Travel & Lodging Expenditures

Justice	Total Category Expenditures	This Category’s Share of Total Expenditures
Wainwright	$104,194	9%
Hecht	$102,121	17%
Medina	$87,494	19%
Jefferson	$74,645	6%
Green	$54,836	7%
Brister	$43,418	9%
Willett	$19,697	1%
Johnson	$16,603	9%
O'Neill	$9,788	4%
TOTALS:	$512,795	7%

 

Largest Single Travel & Lodging Expenditures

Justice	Amount	Recipient	Description	Location
Jefferson	$4,554	Hyatt Lost Pines Resort	Conference expense	Cedar Creek
Wainwright	$4,490	Gary H Martin	Airfare: Senate conferences	Midland
Medina	$3,106	David Medina	Mileage	Austin
Green	$3,065	Southwest Airlines	Travel expense	Dallas
Brister	$2,891	Doubletree Austin Hotel	Investiture family/guests	Austin
Medina	$2,726	David Medina	Mileage reimbursement	Austin
Medina	$2,583	David Medina	Mileage	Austin
Medina	$2,558	David Medina	Mileage	Austin
Wainwright	$2,500	A.W. Born / Golden T-Air	Airfare -Llano Co.	Beaumont
Medina	$2,455	David Medina	Mileage	Austin
Green	$2,400	Yellow Tail G-1 LLC	Travel expense	San Antonio
Jefferson	$2,335	Southwest Airlines	Reimburse Justice for Travel	Austin
Medina	$2,318	David Medina	Mileage reimbursement	Austin
Medina	$2,307	David Medina	Mileage reimbursement	Austin
Hecht	$2,222	Renaissance Mayflower	Room & meals	Washington
Medina	$2,206	David Medina	Mileage reimbursement	Austin
Hecht	$2,192	Renaissance Mayflower	Room	Washington
Medina	$2,154	David Medina	Mileage reimbursement	Austin
Medina	$2,051	David Medina	Mileage	Austin
Green	$2,008	Paul Green	Mileage reimbursement	San Antonio
Green	$2,003	Mayflower Hotel	American Law Institute Mtg.	Washington
Johnson	$1,840	Phil Johnson	Mileage reimburse. Sept/Oct	Austin
Medina	$1,791	David Medina	Mileage reimbursement	Austin
Wainwright	$1,659	Ritz Carlton	Chief Justice Conference	Puerto Rico

            Note: Excludes multiple checks from the same justice to the same recipient.

Remarkably, the $3,106 that Justice Medina reimbursed himself for mileage in May 2007 was the third-largest Travel & Lodging expenditure reported by a member of the court. This payment capped a year in which Medina paid himself more than $2,000 a month for mileage. Justice Medina, who long commuted between Austin and suburban Houston, used campaign funds to reimburse himself for $60,788 worth of mileage expenses from January 2005 through June of 2007. Medina pocketed three-quarter of all the mileage money that the nine justices reimbursed themselves.

Supreme Mileage Odometer

Justice	Total Self- Reimbursements For ‘Mileage’	Share of Mileage Money	Estimated Miles Driven (@ 48.5¢/mile)*	Period Covered	Mileage Itemization
Medina	$60,788	75%	125,336	1/05 – 6/07	None
Jefferson	$8,957	11%	18,468	8/01 – 6/07	None
Johnson	$3,699	5%	7,627	10/05 – 6/07	None
Green	$3,616	4%	7,456	9/03 – 1/05	Some
Wainwright	$3,068	4%	6,326	9/02 – 4/07	Most
Brister	$342	0%	705	12/04 – 1/05	None
Willett	$324	0%	668	11/05 – 2/06	None
Hecht	$0	0%	0	NA	NA
O'Neill	$0	0%	0	NA	NA
TOTAL:	$80,794	100%	166,586

          *This state mileage rate went up to 50.5¢ per mile in January 2008.

The Dallas Morning News first reported Medina’s “unusually large reimbursements” in an October 2007 investigation into the suspicious 2006 fire that consumed Medina’s 5,100-square-foot suburban Houston home.¹⁷ (Citing insufficient evidence, Harris County prosecutors declined to act on a grand jury’s January 2008 indictment of Medina and his wife for evidence tampering and arson, respectively.) Texas Ethics Commission rules bar judges from using campaign funds to pay for their commute. Medina’s case is so flagrant, however, that it may not just be a matter of prohibited reimbursements. During the period covered here, Medina claimed an average of 964 miles per week, which is equivalent to 3.1 weekly round trips between Austin and Spring. Did Justice Medina really drive the equivalent of three round trips a week or did he claim phantom miles? Medina’s attorney has pledged that the justice will repay any improper reimbursements.¹⁸ In January 2008, Medina reported that he repaid his campaign $2,000—or less than one month’s worth of Medina mileage claims.

Austin-based Texas Watch filed Texas Ethics Commission complaints in January 2008 alleging that Justices Green and Hecht also abused campaign funds to pay for personal travel. Justice Green traveled frequently between an Austin apartment and his home in San Antonio. He said the campaign payments were legitimate because he frequently speaks in his hometown to “the local bar, young lawyers, law school, any number of school groups.”¹⁹ From late 2003 through early 2005 Green used political funds to reimburse himself $3,616 for mileage that either was unitemized or was listed as covering mileage between Austin and San Antonio. While most of these payments were under $55, Green paid himself an unspecified “mileage reimbursement” of $2,008 in May 2004. Apart from Green and Wainwright, the other five justices claiming mileage reimbursements provided no accounting for where they drove.

Although Justice Hecht used political funds to pay for $7,500 in ground travel, he spent this money on rental cars, cabs, gas, tolls and parking—not mileage claims. Nonetheless, Hecht has acknowledged using political funds to pay for an unspecified number of flights to and from his hometown of Carrollton. Embracing the concept of the permanent campaign, Hecht—who does not face reelection until 2012—said the trips were campaign related. “I feel like it advances my campaign to go up there and I almost always work when I’m there,” he told the Houston Chronicle in January 2008.²⁰ Hecht’s campaign paid $50,767 for 292 flights to unknown destinations between 2001 and June of 2007. All but two of these flights were on the DFW-based American and Southwest Airlines.

Hecht spent $38,860 on hotels, led by several in Washington, DC. He spent $8,101 for 14 stays at Washington’s Willard InterContinental, $6,950 on four stays at the Renaissance Mayflower and $2,557 on five stays at the Hotel George. None of these stays occurred during Harriet Miers’ short-lived U.S. Supreme Court nomination.

 

Justice O’Neill spent the largest share of her funds on Administrative/Office expenses (30 percent). Justice Hecht came next, spending 9 percent of his funds on this category. For his part, Justice Willett spent just 1 percent of his voluminous funds on Administrative/Office expenses.

Administrative/Office Expenses

Justice	Total Category Expenditures	This Category’s Share of Total Expenditures
O'Neill	$67,553	30%
Wainwright	$57,604	5%
Jefferson	$55,201	4%
Hecht	$51,028	9%
Green	$25,216	3%
Brister	$25,131	5%
Medina	$22,195	5%
Willett	$18,143	1%
Johnson	$6,261	3%
TOTALS:	$328,331	5%

 

Largest Single Administrative/Office Expenses

Justice	Amount	Recipient	Description	City
O'Neill	$15,206	Portraits South	Court portraits	Raleigh, NC
Wainwright	$4,270	A-1 Freeman Location	Moving Expense	Houston
O'Neill	$4,213	Dell Computer	Reimburse Justice O'Neill -  Computer and Equipment Expense	Austin
Brister	$3,943	Berger Allied	Moving services	Houston
Hecht	$3,831	Dell Computer	Computer	Dallas
Medina	$3,403	Dell Computers	Computers	Round Rock
Willett	$2,667	Apple Store #R085	Computer & Printer	Austin
Wainwright	$2,364	Dell Computers	Laptop Computer	Austin
Brister	$1,894	Best Buy	Buy laptop & software	Houston
Jefferson	$1,614	Integrated Network Srvcs	Computer and software	San Antonio
Green	$1,552	Dell Catalog Sales	New computer	Austin
Wainwright	$1,472	Southwest Century Com.	Phone Expenses	Houston
Medina	$1,286	Sprint PCS	Telephone expense	Kansas City
O'Neill	$1,190	Capitol Computer	Computer services	Austin
Jefferson	$1,168	Cedar Park Fabrics	office chair upholstery	Cedar Park
Johnson	$1,082	Best Buy	Computer equipment	Lubbock
Jefferson	$1,072	Impressions Printing	Letterhead & envelopes	Austin
Willett	$1,068	Digital Domain	Digital Services	Austin
Willett	$1,000	Paul Altheide	Contribution Refund	Corpus Christi
Brister	$915	Monarch Trophy	Office Furnishing	Houston
Jefferson	$896	Innovative Photography	Photography	Austin
Willett	$882	Dell Financial Services	Computer purchase	Austin
Wainwright	$869	Verizon Wireless	Phone bill	Houston
Hecht	$853	CompUSA	Supplies	Dallas
Brister	$825	Costco	Office Furniture	Austin
O'Neill	$824	Frank White Photography	Photography	Houston

            Note: Excludes multiple checks from the same justice to the same recipient.

Justice O'Neill, Portraits South

While Justice O’Neill ranked No. 8 on the court in total political expenditures ($223,194), she did not skimp on appearances. She paid North Carolina-based Portraits South a total of $47,610 to paint her official portrait—three times (an earlier version of this report mistakenly suggested that O’Neill bought just one painting).22 O’Neill says Portraits South gave her a deal for producing one portrait for each of the three state courts in which she has presided: the high court, the 14th Court of Appeals and the 152nd District Court. O’Neill’s portrait-related expenditures included $2,374 in “portrait hanging” receptions. Every picture tells a story. The more than $50,000 that O’Neill spent on portrait-related expenses accounted for 23 percent of her total political spending. Former justice John Cornyn spent $23,240 for a portrait (see the same portrait website).23 Ex-Justices Alberto “waterboard” Gonzales and Raul Gonzalez spent $22,008 and $7,818, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Justices Wainwright, Brister and Green spent thousands of political dollars on moving expenses. Justice Wainwright spent a total of $4,451 on movers, with the largest expenditure occurring in August 2003, seven months after he joined the high court. Justice Brister paid movers $3,943 in April 2005, five months after winning his first Supreme Court election. Elected to the court in 2004, Justice Green’s spent a total of $2,121 on moving over the next several years. Texas Ethics Commission rules allow a judge to use political funds “to pay the expenses of moving from his home city to the city where the court sits.”²⁴

The highest single phone bill reported was the $1,286 doozey that Justice Medina paid to Sprint PCS in late May 2007 (every previous Medina phone bill cost less than $500). Justice Medina ran up his biggest phone bill at an intriguing time, paying it one month before the suspicious fire that burned down his home on June 28, 2007. Justice Medina also appears to have burned up cell minutes during the subsequent arson investigation, paying $800 phone bills in the hot months of August and September of 2007.

Justice Hecht’s phone minutes also spiked at a significant time. Hecht, whose cell-phone bill averaged $150 a month, paid a record $286 for the month of October 2005. That was when he conducted some 120 interviews promoting the Supreme Court nomination of Harriet Miers.

 

 

Food, Drinks & Events consumed one out of every $10 that Justices Hecht and O’Neill spent. None of their colleagues spent more than 4 percent of their funds on this category.

Food, Drink & Events Expenses

Justice	Total Category Expenditures	This Category’s Share of Total Expenditures
Hecht	$59,225	10%
Jefferson	$33,355	3%
Green	$28,397	4%
Wainwright	$27,710	3%
O'Neill	$23,299	10%
Medina	$13,486	3%
Willett	$13,273	1%
Brister	$8,391	2%
Johnson	$6,465	3%
TOTALS:	$213,602	3%

 

Largest Single Food, Drink & Events Expenses

Justice	Amount	Recipient	Description	City
Wainwright	$4,031	Hyatt Hotels	GOP Convention party	Dallas
Wainwright	$3,100	Crescent Court Hotel	Catering expense	Dallas
Green	$2,761	Onion Creek Club	Court Christmas party	Austin
Jefferson	$2,420	RK Group	Event expense	San Antonio
Willett	$2,230	Pierre & Candy Massoud	Event expense	Cypress
Green	$2,145	El Mirador Catering	Event expense	San Antonio
Hecht	$2,033	Scholz Garten	Court staff party	Austin
Wainwright	$1,723	Word of Mouth Catering	Court staff Holiday dinner	Austin
Green	$1,702	Lost Creek Country Club	Court Christmas party	Austin
Hecht	$1,700	Lost Creek Country Club	Court party	Austin
Jefferson	$1,698	S.P. Ortiz Int’l Center	Reception expense	Corpus
Johnson	$1,670	George Catering	Event expense	Dallas
Green	$1,644	Austin Club	Event expense	Austin
Green	$1,624	Lee Logan Events, Inc.	Event expense	Dallas
Jefferson	$1,616	Adams Mark	Reception expense	San Antonio
Willett	$1,570	Gretchen Rose Events	Event expense	Dallas
Jefferson	$1,565	African-Am. Lawyers	Reception	San Antonio
Jefferson	$1,438	Headliners Club	Event expense	Austin
Johnson	$1,407	Gretchen Rose Events	Event expense	Dallas
Jefferson	$1,317	Masraff's	Reception expense	Houston
Hecht	$1,303	Pok-E-Jo's	Court party	Austin
Hecht	$1,299	Headliners Club	Staff dinners & lunches	Austin
Willett	$1,224	Nuevo Leon Restaurant	Law clerk welcome party	Austin
O'Neill	$1,135	Mansion at Judges Hill	Access to Justice dinner	Austin
O'Neill	$1,128	Vin Bistro	Dinner for chief justice	Austin
Green	$1,045	Fort Worth Club	Event expense	Fort Worth
O'Neill	$1,000	Jim Benton	Catering portrait hanging	Houston

                   Note: Excludes multiple checks from the same justice to the same recipient.

Receptions held by individual justices accounted for many of the largest Food, Drinks and Events expenditures, with many of these receptions undoubtedly serving as campaign fundraising events. A dozen of the events listed on the accompanying table that cost more than $1,500 were not described as benefiting the court as a whole. In all 12 instances, the justice hosting the big-ticket event did so during an election cycle in which his name appeared on the ballot.

Court parties were another recurring expenditure in this category. Justice Green spent $2,761 for a court Christmas party at Austin’s Onion Creek Club in January 2007. The two preceding years the court held holiday parties at Lost Creek Country Club, with those bashes costing Justices Green and Hecht about $1,700 apiece. The January 2006 fete at Lost Creek Country Club came a little more than a week after Justice Wainwright paid $1,723 to cater yet another holiday party. Back in the summers of 2004 and 2005, Justice Hecht also threw court parties at Scholz’s Garten that cost about $2,000 apiece.